The Heartbreak Kid
Photography by Michael Wolever
The Heartbreak Kid
Photography by Michael Wolever
Frank Dorrey is a pioneer of artistic techniques, taking tools for iPhone image editing and using them to create works that challenge traditional categories like collage, painting, and photography. Beginning with photos on his personal camera roll or pulled from the internet, Dorrey distorts space, blurs figures, and transposes recognizable pop-culture objects to create images as enmeshed in contemporary digital reality as much as timeless dreamworlds. Portraits convey personality and mood, even while physical characteristics fade or warp. Community and friendship emerge from gestures and juxtaposition. Bright, joyful colors take on depth and eeriness. Dorrey starts a new piece whenever the mood strikes, and the result is a body of work full of urgency and immediacy—a reflection of a fascination with form, color, and the eddies of the cultural subconscious.
You don’t have a studio, do you? You do your work in the crib, right?
No studio. This is my studio.
And you work off the iPhone only?
That’s my main thing. The foundation of everything is put together there. I use a bunch of apps—Pixar, which is basically Photoshop for the iPhone, 3D This, which adds textures to photos, stuff like that. Then I take the results and print them on canvas.
I feel Instagram is the new gallery.
I feel Instagram is the new gallery.
Do you see yourself playing with any other mediums some day?
Maybe painting, but it’s not my favorite thing.
Honestly, I like that you’ve embraced technology to produce these—they’re a new kind of painting, actually. They’re unlike anything that’s ever been done before. I love that you don’t have a gallery either—you’ve just got your IG and you sell prints from there. You’re avoiding the whole gallery system.
It’s true. You can skip the process and you’re not afraid to do that. When did you start working in this way?
I always edited photos—even in high school, I would take a picture of myself or a photo that I found on Tumblr and mess with it. Just bored in classes, making stuff. Then it evolved from there as I started experimenting more, using digital interpolation to scale images up, etcetera.
You went to high school in New Jersey, right?
Yes, and then I went to Minnesota for my senior year. It was a weird transition because I had to be a new kid in that last year of school. But I found people in my life that really taught me—like my art teacher, Mr. Gaskins. He was brilliant. He used to tell me about a lot of mythological Greek stuff, like
In the space of my work there are no words, there’s nothing tangible to really attach yourself to. That’s where I think I can get at something like a collective understanding.
In the space of my work there are no words, there’s nothing tangible to really attach yourself to. That’s where I think I can get at something like a collective understanding.
And then you moved back to Jersey?
I moved back to Jersey right after Minnesota and started working as a busboy. And making my pieces.
I’ve been thinking about what Dubois called “double consciousness” recently—how today we have triple consciousness, quadruple consciousness even. Do you feel that split existence comes into your work?
100 percent, because
What movies off the top of your head do you like? Books, other references?
A lot of Rom-Coms. Like this one movie with Ben Stiller,
The images don’t come from dreams, but they do feel like they come from somewhere beyond me. They just pop up and I can’t explain why or where they’re from, you know?
The images don’t come from dreams, but they do feel like they come from somewhere beyond me. They just pop up and I can’t explain why or where they’re from, you know?
I really feel your work comes out of a new kind of existence. The pieces are like hyper-contemporary dreamscapes. You’ve scoped out all these daily images, but then put them into this other world. Does that stuff come from your dreams?
The images don’t come from dreams, but they do feel like they come from somewhere beyond me. They just pop up and I can’t explain why or where they’re from, you know?
There’s stuff that seems pretty spirited about it. Do you feel possessed almost?
[laughs] In the most beautiful way, for sure.
In a good way, I mean!
I mean, in terms of spirit coming through, I grew up in the Church, but I felt detached from a lot of those beliefs. I can’t help it though; those things stick with you. I do recognize there’s something higher, but explaining what that is has always been a battle for me.
I’m realizing that every time I go through those really bad moments, I come out of it finding new ways to love.
I’m realizing that every time I go through those really bad moments, I come out of it finding new ways to love.
I can feel that tension you’re describing in the pieces. It comes through, it does. The work has got this real lightness to it, but it’s also super dark at times, which is one reason I love it so much. I don’t know, as I keep getting older, it all seems to be getting darker.
It gets brighter too, the light definitely gets brighter.
Eventually, I hope it does. It definitely goes in and out, I feel.
I was feeling that way last night—just super destroyed. But I’m realizing that every time I go through those really bad moments, I come out of it finding new ways to love. To me that’s the craziest thing, because no matter what, you always discover something new.
AA:
what does the revolution will be televised mean to you
Chat GPT:
The phrase “the revolution will be televised” originated from a 1970 song by Gil Scott-Heron. It suggests that the struggles for change, especially political or social revolution, would be broadcast on television—though not in the way activists or revolutionaries might hope. Instead of being directly engaged in or informed by the grassroots movements, the media would likely sensationalize or commercialize the event. It captures a tension between the authenticity of grassroots struggle and the way it might be mediated or controlled by mainstream media.
To me, the phrase also speaks to the idea of spectacle in activism—how movements might be commodified or reduced to entertainment or soundbites when presented through media. It’s a reflection on how technology can both connect people and distort the realities of social change.
AA:
no, gil scott heron said the revolution will not be televised
Chat GPT:
You’re absolutely right—Gil Scott-Heron’s poem/song “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised” actually emphasizes that real, transformative social change won’t be captured or sanitized by the media. It warns against the idea that media coverage will authentically represent or convey the true nature of a revolution or movement. The revolution, in Scott-Heron’s view, will be a grassroots, lived experience, not a spectacle for consumption or commodification on TV.
The phrase “The revolution will be televised” is often used ironically, referencing the disconnect between the real struggles of revolution and the way they are typically portrayed by mass media, which can dilute or distort their meaning. So, when people say “the revolution will be televised,” they may be acknowledging that, while media will likely cover it, it will never truly capture the raw, genuine heart of a revolutionary movement.
It’s a critique of the media’s role in shaping narratives and a reminder that meaningful change happens beyond the reach of spectacle.
AA:
so what would the revolution WILL be televised mean to you
Chat GPT:
“The revolution WILL be televised” flips the original idea on its head. If we take it literally and in a contemporary sense, it could suggest that social movements or revolutions are now not only covered by media, but actually shaped and influenced by the media itself. In the age of social media, live streaming, and 24/7 news cycles, revolutions and activism are happening in real-time, and the narrative is often driven by the visibility they gain on platforms like Twitter, Instagram, or TikTok.
In this sense, the revolution could be televised (or streamed, or shared) in a way that amplifies voices and causes, helping them to spread globally. However, there’s still the question of whether such media coverage is accurate or authentic. It might be more about spectacle or performative activism than genuine, transformative change.
So, to me, “The revolution WILL be televised” could mean that while media and technology can give revolutions unprecedented exposure, it also raises questions about the impact of that exposure. Is the revolution being commodified? Is it truly transformative, or is it just another trend being broadcast for consumption?